Inside the business of finance

Company Spotlight · Sponsored

FintechCompany Spotlight

HL Hunt’s Metro 2 Software Automates Bureau Files. It Cannot Validate Whether the Underlying Data Is True.

HL Hunt Financial sponsored this Company Spotlight on Metro 2 Reporting Software, which converts raw loan data into bureau-ready files, checks more than 200 formatting rules and starts at $99 per month for up to 500 tradelines.

By MFN Staff
2comments
Bureau-ready credit reporting data being validated against structured Metro 2 fields
Bureau-ready credit reporting data being validated against structured Metro 2 fields

SPONSORED CONTENT — HL Hunt Financial’s Metro 2 Reporting Software is built for lenders, credit builders and furnishers that need to convert loan or account data into the standardized format used to submit information to consumer reporting agencies. The product page says the tool converts raw data into bureau-ready files and checks each file against more than 200 validation rules before submission.

That automation addresses a real operational problem: Metro 2 files contain tightly structured fields for account status, payment history, balances, dates and identifying information, and a formatting error can cause rejects or inaccurate reporting. HL Hunt says its system supports Equifax, Experian and TransUnion and can process a file in under five seconds, with dashboard monitoring, error alerts and audit trails.

The important boundary is between formatting validation and truth validation. A system can confirm that a field is present, correctly formatted and internally consistent without knowing whether the reported balance, payment status or date is factually correct. The furnisher remains responsible for the source data, dispute handling, permissible purpose and compliance with the rules that govern credit reporting.

HL Hunt lists pricing starting at $99 per month for up to 500 tradelines, $249 for up to 2,500 and higher tiers for larger files, with custom enterprise pricing. Its page also advertises 99.9% validation accuracy and a SOC 2 controls framework. Those are company representations; the site does not publish an independent audit or methodology, so a prospective furnisher should ask for evidence of bureau acceptance rates, incident response and how corrections are handled before relying on the software in production.