The Clearing House Picks Quant to Build a Shared Settlement Network for Tokenized Bank Deposits
The bank-owned payments utility behind RTP and CHIPS has selected blockchain infrastructure firm Quant to power its On-Chain Money Initiative, aiming to let major U.S. banks clear and settle tokenized deposits across a shared network by the first half of 2027.

NEW YORK — The Clearing House, the payments utility owned by the largest U.S. banks and the operator of the RTP instant-payments network and the CHIPS wholesale settlement system, has selected Quant to provide the underlying infrastructure for its On-Chain Money Initiative. The project is designed to let participating banks clear and settle tokenized deposits — digital representations of commercial bank money — on a shared network, with connectivity back into The Clearing House's existing fiat rails rather than as a parallel, disconnected system.
The Clearing House says the network is expected to become available to participating institutions in the first half of 2027, which puts this squarely in the buildout phase rather than production. No transaction volumes, participating bank list beyond The Clearing House's existing member roster, or pricing terms have been disclosed publicly as of this writing.
The initiative fits a pattern that has accelerated through 2026: rather than each bank building its own tokenized-deposit rails or relying solely on public stablecoins for internal settlement, a cluster of shared-infrastructure efforts — from consortium ledgers to interbank pilots — has emerged aiming to keep tokenized bank money interoperable across institutions from the outset. The Clearing House, given its role as the entity multiple large banks already rely on for RTP and CHIPS, is a natural candidate to run a shared utility for tokenized deposits rather than leaving each bank to solve interoperability on its own.
Quant's selection is notable because the firm's core business has been interoperability — connecting distinct blockchain networks and enterprise systems rather than operating its own retail-facing chain. That positioning is consistent with what The Clearing House is describing: a settlement layer meant to plug into banks' existing core systems and existing fiat rails, not a new standalone ledger requiring banks to rebuild their infrastructure from scratch.
What remains to be seen, given the initiative is still roughly a year and a half from its stated availability target, is how many of The Clearing House's bank owners actually commit transaction volume to the network once it is live, and whether "tokenized deposits" issued by different banks on a shared settlement layer can move as fungibly as ordinary correspondent-banking deposits do today. Those are the operational questions that determine whether a shared ledger becomes genuine infrastructure or one more pilot that stays limited to a handful of participants.